argumentation | Jean Goodwin

Browsing All posts tagged under »argumentation«

Critical questions about scientific research publications in the online mask debate

June 14, 2021

Goodwin, Jean & Ekaterina Bogomoletc. (Forthcoming, 2021). Critical questions about scientific research publications in the online mask debate. In S. Oswald, M. Lewinski, S. Greco & S. Villata (Eds.), The Pandemic of Argumentation. Springer.

Should climate scientists fly? A case study of arguments at the system level

August 1, 2020

Goodwin, Jean. (2020). Should climate scientists fly? A case study of arguments at the system level. Informal Logic, 40(2), 157-203.

Radically reframing the climate debate: The rhetorical strategies of The Hartwell Paper

November 1, 2019

Goodwin, Jean. (2019). Radically reframing the climate debate: The rhetorical strategies of The Hartwell Paper. In Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, Argumentation in actual practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context (pp. 157-72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

The pragmatic force of making an argument

October 1, 2019

Goodwin, Jean, & Innocenti, Beth (2019). The pragmatic force of making an argument. Topoi 4, 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-019-09643-8

Sophistical refutations in the climate change debates.

February 19, 2019

Goodwin, Jean. (2019). Sophistical refutations in the climate change debates. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1, 40–64. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18008.goo A case study of a short televised debate between a climate scientist and an advocate for climate skepticism provides the basis for developing a contemporary conception of sophistry. The sophist has a high degree of argumentative content […]

Re-framing climate controversy: The strategies of The Hartwell Paper

October 8, 2018

Goodwin, Jean. (2019) Re-framing climate controversy: The strategies of The Hartwell Paper. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation.

The pragmatic force of making reasons apparent

September 15, 2015

Goodwin Pragmatic ForceGoodwin, J., & Innocenti, B. (2016). The Pragmatic Force of Making Reasons Apparent. InD. Mohammed & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action (Vol. 2, pp. 449–462). College Publications. Making arguments makes reasons apparent. Sometimes those reasons may affect audiences. But over-emphasis on effects distracts from other things that making arguments accomplishes and thus […]

How to exercise expert authority: A case study of a scientist facing The Sceptics.

September 11, 2015

Goodwin, Jean. (2015). Comment exercer une autorité experte? Un scientifique confronté aux Sceptiques. Argumentation et Analyse du Discours, 15. Retrieved from https://aad.revues.org/2035 [How to exercise expert authority: A case study of a scientist facing The Sceptics. (2015). How to exercise expert authority: A case study of a scientist facing The Sceptics.] Argumetation theorists’ primary loyalty should be […]

Climate scientist Stephen Schneider versus the Sceptics: A case study of argumentation in deep disagreement.

September 11, 2015

Goodwin, Jean. (2015). Climate scientist Stephen Schneider versus the Sceptics: A case study of argumentation in deep disagreement. In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Sic Sat. Retrieved from http://rozenbergquarterly.com/issa-proceedings-2014-climate-scientist-stephen-schneider-versus-the-sceptics-a-case-study-of-argumentation-in-deep-disagreement/

Conceptions of speech acts in the theory and practice of argumentation

April 20, 2014

Goodwin, Jean. (2014). Conceptions of speech acts in the theory and practice of argumentation: A case study of a debate about advocating. Studies in Logic, Grammar & Rhetoric, 36 (49), 79-98. Far from being of interest only to argumentation theorists, concep- tions of speech acts play an important role in practitioners’ self-reflection on their own activities. […]