Subscribe:
RSS feed
Browsing All Posts filed under »publications«
Re-framing climate controversy: The strategies of The Hartwell Paper
Goodwin, Jean. (2019) Re-framing climate controversy: The strategies of The Hartwell Paper. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation.
Ethics and Practice in Science Communication
March 1, 2018
Priest, Susanna, Goodwin, Jean, & Dahlstrom, Michael F. (Eds.). (2018). Ethics and Practice in Science Communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2018 Top Edited Book Award, Communication Ethics Division, National Communication Association. From climate to vaccination, stem-cell research to evolution, scientific work is often the subject of public controversies in which scientists and science communicators […]
Confronting the challenges of public participation: Issues in environmental, planning and health decision-making.
December 1, 2016
Goodwin, Jean. (2016). Confronting the challenges of public participation: Issues in environmental, planning and health decision-making. Proceedings of a symposium at Iowa State University, June 3-4, 2016. Charleston, SC: CreateSpace. Get these proceedings–>
Objecting to Models: A Typology of Non-experts’ Critiques of Models of Human-Natural Systems
December 1, 2016
Goodwin, Jean. (2016). Objecting to Models: A Typology of Non-experts’ Critiques of Models of Human-Natural Systems. In Jean Goodwin (Ed.), Confronting the Challenges of Public Participation: Issues in Environmental, Planning and Health Decision-Making (pp. 39-49). Charleston, SC: CreateSpace.
The pragmatic force of making reasons apparent
September 15, 2015
Goodwin Pragmatic ForceGoodwin, J., & Innocenti, B. (2016). The Pragmatic Force of Making Reasons Apparent. InD. Mohammed & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action (Vol. 2, pp. 449–462). College Publications. Making arguments makes reasons apparent. Sometimes those reasons may affect audiences. But over-emphasis on effects distracts from other things that making arguments accomplishes and thus […]
How to be a better functionalist
September 13, 2015
Goodwin, J. (2016). How to Be a Better Functionalist. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action (Vol. 1, pp. 515–519). College Publications. Theorists have found it easy to derive norms for argumentation from asserted functions of argument. The work of Dima Mohammed has taken a big step forward in making function theories […]
Audiences as normative roles
September 11, 2015
Goodwin, J. (2016). Audiences as Normative Roles. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action (Vol. 1, pp. 589–592). London: College Publications. Palmieri and Mazzali-Lurati have it right: audiences in argumentative transactions should be defined by the normatively-grounded roles they take. Get this paper.
On the blog
- But you haven’t told me how to persuade!
- Should climate scientists fly? 2. Argumentative bad faith
- Should climate scientists fly? 1. The skeptics’ hypocrisy argument
- Should climate scientists fly? An analysis of the arguments
- Stop looking for specks of climate skepticism
- Should the existence of an “anti-vax” movement change what scientists can say in publications?
- Morano v. Bauman
- Why do people (scientists) think there is a “war on science”?–Bibliography
- Post & Ramirez (2018): Scientists’ (mis)perceptions of press bias induce advocacy in response
- Responsibility for polar bear arguments
Jean Goodwin 
October 8, 2018
0