Browsing All posts tagged under »the tradition«

Lippmann, the indispensable opposition

July 14, 2012

0

Lippmann's thoroughgoing pessimism may lead us to a better understanding of the role of communication in public deliberations between scientists and citizens.

Theoretical pieties, Johnstone’s impiety, and ordinary views of argumentation

July 14, 2012

0

We teachers of argument have nothing to apologize for.

Johnstone’s still-unacknowledged contributions to contemporary argumentation theory

July 13, 2012

0

Given the pragmatic turn recently taken by argumentation studies, we owe renewed attention to Henry Johnstone's views on the primacy of process over product.

Wigmore’s Chart Method

July 13, 2012

0

Legal scholar John Henry Wigmore invented a scheme for representing arguments in a tree diagram, aimed to help advocates analyze the proof of facts at trial

Pereman, adhering and conviction

July 13, 2012

0

Cite: Goodwin, Jean. “Perelman, Adhering and Convictions.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 28 (1995): 215-33. Abstract: Perelman’s theory of argumentation is based on a one-dimensional psychology of adherence: people stick to propositions, with various degrees of strength. This is inadequate to account for the rhetorical force of the convictions people commit themselves to–which become an aspect of their […]