Subscribe:
RSS feed
Browsing All posts tagged under »public sphere«
Lippmann, the indispensable opposition
Lippmann's thoroughgoing pessimism may lead us to a better understanding of the role of communication in public deliberations between scientists and citizens.
Institutions for argument: Cultivating the formation of collective intent
July 13, 2012
Argumentation, while it seldom resolves issues, does create conditions under which collective intentions can more securely be ascribed.
The public sphere and the norms of transactional argument
July 13, 2012
Papers by Asen and Rehg get us halfway to an understanding of the activity of arguing in the public sphere.
On the blog
- But you haven’t told me how to persuade!
- Should climate scientists fly? 2. Argumentative bad faith
- Should climate scientists fly? 1. The skeptics’ hypocrisy argument
- Should climate scientists fly? An analysis of the arguments
- Stop looking for specks of climate skepticism
- Should the existence of an “anti-vax” movement change what scientists can say in publications?
- Morano v. Bauman
- Why do people (scientists) think there is a “war on science”?–Bibliography
- Post & Ramirez (2018): Scientists’ (mis)perceptions of press bias induce advocacy in response
- Responsibility for polar bear arguments
Jean Goodwin 
July 14, 2012
0