Subscribe:
RSS feed
Browsing All posts tagged under »normative pragmatic approach«
The noncooperative pragmatics of arguing
As seen in the OJ Simpson criminal trial, arguing can be both noncooperative and normatively good.
Johnstone’s still-unacknowledged contributions to contemporary argumentation theory
July 13, 2012
Given the pragmatic turn recently taken by argumentation studies, we owe renewed attention to Henry Johnstone's views on the primacy of process over product.
Comments on Scott Jacobs’ ‘Rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics’
July 13, 2012
I lay out the basic working principles of a normative pragmatic approach to argumentation.
On the blog
- But you haven’t told me how to persuade!
- Should climate scientists fly? 2. Argumentative bad faith
- Should climate scientists fly? 1. The skeptics’ hypocrisy argument
- Should climate scientists fly? An analysis of the arguments
- Stop looking for specks of climate skepticism
- Should the existence of an “anti-vax” movement change what scientists can say in publications?
- Morano v. Bauman
- Why do people (scientists) think there is a “war on science”?–Bibliography
- Post & Ramirez (2018): Scientists’ (mis)perceptions of press bias induce advocacy in response
- Responsibility for polar bear arguments
Jean Goodwin 
July 13, 2012
0