Subscribe:
RSS feed
Browsing All posts tagged under »science communication«
Objecting to Models: A Typology of Non-experts’ Critiques of Models of Human-Natural Systems
Goodwin, Jean. (2016). Objecting to Models: A Typology of Non-experts’ Critiques of Models of Human-Natural Systems. In Jean Goodwin (Ed.), Confronting the Challenges of Public Participation: Issues in Environmental, Planning and Health Decision-Making (pp. 39-49). Charleston, SC: CreateSpace.
Conceptions of speech acts in the theory and practice of argumentation
April 20, 2014
Goodwin, Jean. (2014). Conceptions of speech acts in the theory and practice of argumentation: A case study of a debate about advocating. Studies in Logic, Grammar & Rhetoric, 36 (49), 79-98. Far from being of interest only to argumentation theorists, concep- tions of speech acts play an important role in practitioners’ self-reflection on their own activities. […]
A Preliminary Report on Cases for Teaching Responsible Communication of Science
February 4, 2014
Goodwin, Jean, Michael Dahlstrom, Mari Kemis, Clark Wolf & Christine Hutchison. (2013). A Preliminary Report on Cases for Teaching Responsible Communication of Science. In Jean Goodwin, Michael F. Dahlstrom & Susanna Priest (Eds.), Ethical issues in science communication: A theory-based approach (pp. 71-79). Charleston, SC: CreateSpace. As scientists heed the call to achieve broader impacts […]
Towards a research agenda for science communication ethics
February 4, 2014
Goodwin, Jean, Dahlstrom, Michael F., & Priest, Susanna. (2013). Introduction: Towards a research agenda for science communication ethics. In Jean Goodwin, Michael F. Dahlstrom & Susanna Priest (Eds.), Ethical issues in science communication: A theory-based approach (pp. 1-3). Charleston, SC: CreateSpace. The ethical issues surrounding communication of science to the public, as predicted before the […]
Introduction: Collaborations between scientists and rhetoricians of science/technology/medicine
February 4, 2014
Goodwin, J. (2014). Introduction: Collaborations between scientists and rhetoricians of science/technology/medicine. Poroi, 10(1). doi:10.13008/2151-2957.1176 It is the best of times: scientists and humanists studying communication know they need each other. It is the worst of times: what we expect of each other doesn’t match up. In this introduction to a special section of Poroi, I describe […]
Rhetorical Resources for Teaching Responsible Communication of Science
February 4, 2014
Goodwin, Jean; Dahlstrom, Michael F.; Kemis, Mari; Wolf, Clark; and Hutchison, Christine. “Rhetorical Resources for Teaching Responsible Communication of Science.” Poroi 10, Iss. 1 (2014): Article 7. doi:10.13008/2151-2957.1179 A report on our NSF-funded work to build cases exploring ethical challenges when scientists address the public. Get this paper at: http://ir.uiowa.edu/poroi/vol10/iss1/7/
Ethical issues in science communication
December 24, 2013
Goodwin, Jean, Michael F. Dahlstrom & Susanna Priest (Eds.), Ethical issues in science communication: A theory-based approach: Proceedings of a symposium at Iowa State University, May 30-June 1, 2013. Charleston, SC: CreateSpace. Buy it at Amazon.
On the blog
- But you haven’t told me how to persuade!
- Should climate scientists fly? 2. Argumentative bad faith
- Should climate scientists fly? 1. The skeptics’ hypocrisy argument
- Should climate scientists fly? An analysis of the arguments
- Stop looking for specks of climate skepticism
- Should the existence of an “anti-vax” movement change what scientists can say in publications?
- Morano v. Bauman
- Why do people (scientists) think there is a “war on science”?–Bibliography
- Post & Ramirez (2018): Scientists’ (mis)perceptions of press bias induce advocacy in response
- Responsibility for polar bear arguments
Jean Goodwin 
December 1, 2016
0